The traditional classroom, often characterized by rows of desks facing a lecturing teacher, has long grappled with the challenge of passive learning. Students, relegated to the role of information recipients, can struggle with engagement, motivation, and deep comprehension. Into this landscape, interactive whiteboards, and notably the SMART Board, emerged as a revolutionary technology, promising to transform static chalkboards and whiteboards into dynamic, collaborative learning hubs. This article embarks on a journey to provide the definitive chronicle of Smart Board evolution: tracing its history from pioneering concepts, unpacking breakthrough innovations that have shaped its capabilities, exploring its transformative educational power, and looking towards its future trajectory. We will delve into the pre-digital classroom’s limitations, chart the genesis of interactive displays, detail the SMART Board’s commercialization and key developmental milestones, examine its core and advanced technologies, and analyze its profound impact on pedagogy, ultimately envisioning the future of interactive learning.
- The Pre-Digital Classroom: Understanding Traditional Teaching Limitations
- The Genesis of Interaction: Pioneering Concepts and Early Interactive Displays
- The SMART Revolution: Birth and Commercialization of the SMART Board
- Timeline of Transformation: Key Milestones in Smart Board Development (1990s-2010s)
- Under the Hood: Core Technologies and Features That Defined Smart Boards
- The Modern Classroom Hub: Current Smart Board Innovations
- Transforming Pedagogy: The Educational Impact of Smart Boards
- Navigating the Journey: Early Challenges and Modern Solutions in Smart Board Implementation
- The Future is Interactive: Emerging Trends and What’s Next for Smart Board Technology
- Conclusion
- References
The Pre-Digital Classroom: Understanding Traditional Teaching Limitations
Before the widespread adoption of interactive technologies like smart boards, conventional teaching methods, while possessing certain merits, presented several inherent drawbacks. These limitations often hindered the creation of truly dynamic and personalized learning experiences. The traditional model frequently fostered passive learning environments, where students were primarily receivers of information rather than active participants in its construction. This could lead to diminished student engagement and a lack of personalization in the learning journey. As noted by educational resource platforms, a significant disadvantage of traditional methods is their tendency towards a one-size-fits-all approach, making it difficult to cater to diverse learning styles and paces1. Furthermore, resource constraints, both in terms of materials and teacher time, coupled with rigid curriculum structures, often limited the scope and creativity of educational delivery. These challenges set the stage for technological innovations aimed at revolutionizing the classroom.
The Challenge of Passive Learning Environments
Passive learning environments are characterized by teacher-centered instruction, where knowledge is primarily transmitted from the educator to the students, who are expected to absorb it, often through lectures and note-taking, without significant active involvement. This approach, as highlighted by educational resources like Strobel Education, contrasts sharply with active learning, which emphasizes student participation, collaboration, and critical thinking2. The core issue with passive learning is its impact on student motivation and information retention. When students are not actively engaged in processing, discussing, or applying information, their ability to internalize and recall it effectively diminishes. Research in educational psychology consistently supports the notion that active engagement leads to deeper understanding and better long-term retention. A striking statistic often cited suggests that an estimated 60 percent of people tend to be passive learners when placed in traditional learning settings, underscoring the widespread nature of this challenge3. Identifying and mitigating passive learning tendencies involves shifting towards student-centered methodologies, where learners are encouraged to explore, question, and collaborate, transforming them from spectators into active participants in their educational journey.
Resource Constraints and Structural Rigidity in Traditional Education
Beyond the challenge of passive learning, traditional education systems have often grappled with significant resource constraints and structural inflexibility. These limitations extend beyond simply the availability of diverse course offerings. As discussed by educational commentators and resources like Teachers Institute, constraints can manifest as insufficient funding for updated textbooks and materials, limited access to specialized equipment, and, crucially, the immense pressure on teacher time1. Educators often find themselves stretched thin, trying to manage large class sizes while adhering to standardized curricula, leaving little room for personalized attention or innovative teaching approaches. This structural rigidity, often characterized by a heavy reliance on standardized testing as the primary measure of success, can stifle creativity and critical thinking. Educational reports have pointed out that such inflexible systems may struggle to adapt to the evolving needs of students and the demands of a rapidly changing world, potentially hindering the development of skills crucial for future success.
The Genesis of Interaction: Pioneering Concepts and Early Interactive Displays
The journey towards the modern interactive whiteboard began well before the first commercial products hit the market. The conceptual roots can be traced back to foundational work in human-computer interaction. A pivotal player in this early phase was Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center). During the 1970s and into the 1980s, PARC was a hotbed of innovation, developing concepts that would become fundamental to personal computing, including the Graphical User Interface (GUI), the mouse, and networked computing4. While not creating a “smart board” as we know it today, their research into direct manipulation of on-screen objects and collaborative digital workspaces laid crucial groundwork. By 1990, Xerox PARC had developed an early version of an interactive whiteboard, demonstrating the feasibility of a large, touch-sensitive display that could interact with a computer5. This early work explored how people could naturally interact with digital information on a shared surface, influencing the trajectory of interactive display technology. Concepts like GUIs and direct manipulation, championed by PARC, were essential precursors, making the idea of intuitively interacting with a large digital canvas a tangible possibility.
The SMART Revolution: Birth and Commercialization of the SMART Board
While Xerox PARC explored early concepts, it was SMART Technologies Inc. that brought the interactive whiteboard into the commercial realm and, eventually, into classrooms worldwide. Founded by David Martin and Nancy Knowlton, SMART Technologies was driven by the vision of creating tools that would enhance collaboration and learning. The company officially states that they invented the SMART Board in 19877. Following this invention, a key milestone was reached in 1991 when SMART Technologies launched the world’s first commercial interactive whiteboard, the SMART Board8. This revolutionary product connected to a computer and a projector, allowing users to control computer applications directly from the display’s surface using touch.
Initially, these interactive whiteboards found traction in corporate boardrooms and training facilities as powerful presentation tools. However, their potential in education soon became apparent. A significant comparison point arises when considering Xerox PARC’s 1990 prototype, which was more of a research concept, versus SMART Technologies’ 1991 commercial product, which was a market-ready solution. SMART’s offering was designed for broader usability and integration with existing computer technologies. The late 1990s marked a crucial period where the educational sector began to recognize the immense potential of these interactive tools to transform teaching and learning, leading to a surge in adoption9. This shift was driven by a growing understanding of the need for more engaging and interactive pedagogical approaches, coupled with the increasing availability and affordability of the technology. Educators saw the SMART Board as a way to move beyond static presentations, to bring digital resources to life, and to foster more dynamic student participation.
From Corporate Boardrooms to Classroom Walls: The Strategic Shift
The late 1990s witnessed a pivotal transition for interactive whiteboards, as their primary sphere of influence began to shift from corporate environments to educational institutions. While businesses initially embraced the technology for presentations and collaborative meetings, the unique demands and aspirations of the K-12 education sector provided fertile ground for widespread adoption9. Several market factors and educational needs fueled this surge. Educators were increasingly seeking tools to overcome the limitations of traditional teaching, particularly the challenge of engaging a diverse student population with varied learning styles. Interactive whiteboards offered a visually stimulating and hands-on approach to learning, capable of integrating multimedia resources, interactive software, and internet connectivity directly into the lesson. Furthermore, there was a growing push for technology integration in schools, driven by government initiatives and a recognition that digital literacy was becoming an essential skill. The perceived benefits of enhanced student participation, improved comprehension of complex concepts through visual aids, and the ability to save and share lessons digitally resonated strongly with teachers and administrators, paving the way for interactive whiteboards to become a ubiquitous feature in classrooms around the globe.
Timeline of Transformation: Key Milestones in Smart Board Development (1990s-2010s)
The evolution of the SMART Board from its initial launch into a sophisticated educational tool is marked by a series of significant technological advancements and feature introductions throughout the 1990s and 2010s. SMART Technologies consistently innovated, refining the hardware and developing powerful software to enhance the user experience. An academic perspective, such as that offered by OpenTextbooks by Clemson University, often highlights these developments as crucial steps in the integration of technology into classrooms10. A visual timeline would effectively capture these milestones.
Early Enhancements: Rear-Projection and Software Integration (1990s – Early 2000s)
Following the initial 1991 launch, SMART Technologies continued to refine its offerings. A significant early hardware development was the introduction of a rear-projection SMART Board in 199211. This addressed the issue of presenters casting shadows on front-projected screens. Further refinement led to an in-wall rear-projection model in 1997, offering a more integrated and sleeker classroom solution12.
Alongside hardware, software development was critical. By 2001, SMART Notebook software version 2.0 was released, providing educators with a more robust platform for creating, delivering, and managing interactive lessons. The SMART Recorder also became available around this time, allowing teachers to capture their on-screen activity and voice narration, creating reusable learning objects or review materials for students13. These early enhancements focused on improving display quality, integration, and providing foundational software tools to leverage the interactive capabilities of the board.
Expanding Interactivity: Tablet Integration and DViT Technology (Mid 2000s – 2010)
The mid-2000s saw further leaps in interactivity and flexibility. In 2005, SMART introduced tablet integration, allowing educators and students to interact with the SMART Board wirelessly from a slate, adding notes or controlling applications from anywhere in the classroom14. This untethered interaction provided greater mobility for teachers and opportunities for students to participate directly from their desks. The user experience was enhanced by the ability to easily pass the slate around, fostering broader participation.
A major technological advancement came in 2010 with the introduction of DViT (Digital Vision Touch) technology15. DViT technology utilizes proprietary digital cameras integrated into the board’s frame to detect touch and pen input. This innovation offered improved touch accuracy, responsiveness, and the ability to support multi-touch gestures, making the interaction more intuitive and aligned with the evolving user expectations shaped by smartphones and tablets. DViT marked a significant step up from earlier resistive or capacitive touch technologies, providing a more robust and precise interactive experience.
Under the Hood: Core Technologies and Features That Defined Smart Boards
The magic of smart boards lies in a confluence of core technologies and thoughtfully designed features that enable their interactive capabilities. Over the years, various touch technologies have been employed. Early boards often used resistive technology, which relied on pressure to detect input. Later, optical technologies, including DViT (Digital Vision Touch), became prominent. DViT, as developed by SMART Technologies, uses cameras in the bezel of the interactive whiteboard to track the position of a finger or pen on the surface. This system allows for high accuracy, fast response times, and multi-touch capabilities, enabling intuitive gestures like pinch-to-zoom and rotate, which became increasingly important as users grew accustomed to such interactions on personal devices.
Equally crucial has been the evolution of software suites, with SMART Notebook being a flagship example. From its early versions, SMART Notebook software provided tools for creating and delivering interactive lessons. Its evolution saw the addition of a vast library of curriculum content, drawing tools, multimedia integration, and features that allow teachers to design engaging activities. The pedagogical value of SMART Notebook grew as it incorporated features supporting different learning styles, assessment tools, and collaborative exercises. Connectivity options also evolved, from serial and USB connections to wireless capabilities, further enhancing the flexibility and ease of use in diverse classroom setups. These underlying technologies, working in concert, transformed a simple display surface into a powerful interactive learning hub.
The Modern Classroom Hub: Current Smart Board Innovations
Contemporary smart boards have evolved far beyond their initial iterations, incorporating a host of sophisticated features that position them as central hubs in the modern connected classroom. Enhanced touch and gesture recognition are now standard, offering highly responsive and intuitive interaction, often supporting multiple simultaneous touch points for collaborative work. Insights from manufacturers like HushidaTouch indicate a continuous drive towards more natural and seamless user experiences16.
A significant trend is the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Augmented Reality (AR). While still an evolving area, AI is being explored for features like intelligent content recommendations, automated assessment feedback, and even personalized learning path adjustments. AR capabilities can overlay digital information onto the physical world viewed through a connected device or directly on the board, creating immersive learning experiences – for instance, dissecting a virtual frog or exploring a 3D model of the solar system. Research papers on AI/AR in education highlight the potential for these technologies to deepen engagement and understanding17.
Modular and customizable displays are also emerging, allowing schools to tailor screen sizes and configurations to specific needs. Perhaps one of the most impactful advancements is the deeper integration of the Internet of Things (IoT). This includes features like split-screen teaching (allowing multiple content sources or activities to be displayed simultaneously), seamless lesson recording and sharing, and real-time feedback systems. Some advanced smart boards, as detailed by manufacturers like BenQ, now incorporate environmental sensors that can monitor classroom conditions like temperature, humidity, and CO2 levels, providing data that can be used to optimize the learning environment18.
Furthermore, there’s a growing emphasis on sustainability. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on eco-friendly designs, using more sustainable materials, reducing energy consumption, and ensuring longer product lifecycles. These efforts address both environmental concerns and the total cost of ownership for educational institutions.
Smarter Interaction: AI and AR Integration
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Augmented Reality (AR) into smart boards represents a frontier in interactive learning, promising to make classroom experiences more adaptive, engaging, and insightful. AI algorithms are being developed to personalize learning by analyzing student interaction patterns with the smart board, potentially identifying areas where individuals or groups are struggling and suggesting tailored content or activities. Some manufacturers, like HushidaTouch, are actively involved in R&D for such intelligent features16. Imagine a smart board that offers intelligent tutoring assistance, provides real-time feedback on student responses, or even helps teachers differentiate instruction more effectively. Academic discussions and tech journals focusing on AI in education often point to these applications as transformative17.
Augmented Reality, on the other hand, can bring abstract concepts to life by overlaying digital information and 3D models onto the smart board or the classroom environment viewed through a connected device. Students could explore the human anatomy in three dimensions, walk through historical sites, or conduct virtual science experiments. This immersive approach can significantly enhance comprehension and retention, particularly for visual and kinesthetic learners. While widespread implementation is still developing, the potential for AI and AR to create richer, more interactive, and personalized educational experiences via smart boards is substantial.
Connected Classrooms: IoT and Advanced Features
The modern smart board is increasingly a node in the connected classroom, leveraging Internet of Things (IoT) capabilities and offering advanced features that streamline teaching and enhance learning. Manufacturers like BenQ are at the forefront of integrating such functionalities18. Split-screen teaching, for example, allows educators to display multiple content sources simultaneously – perhaps a video alongside interactive notes, or a shared document next to a live web feed. This versatility supports more dynamic lesson structures and comparative analysis.
Lesson recording is another powerful feature. Teachers can capture entire lessons, including on-screen annotations and audio, creating valuable resources for student review, flipped classroom models, or for colleagues. This also aids in professional development and sharing best practices. IoT integration extends to real-time feedback systems, where students can respond to questions or polls using connected devices, with results instantly displayed and aggregated on the smart board. This facilitates quick formative assessment and gauges student understanding on the fly.
Furthermore, some smart boards now include environmental sensors. These can monitor factors like CO2 levels, temperature, and humidity. As highlighted by educational technology discussions, data from these sensors can be invaluable for administrators and teachers to ensure the physical learning environment is conducive to concentration and well-being, potentially leading to adjustments in ventilation or room usage to optimize conditions19. These interconnected features transform the smart board into an intelligent assistant for the educator and a more responsive tool for the learner.
Transforming Pedagogy: The Educational Impact of Smart Boards
The introduction and evolution of smart boards have had a profound impact on pedagogy, catalyzing a shift away from traditional teacher-centric models towards more student-centered, interactive, and collaborative learning environments. One of the most significant contributions is their role in combating passive learning. By providing a dynamic and engaging platform, smart boards encourage active participation. Research, such as the findings from a comprehensive meta-analysis, has indicated a positive correlation between the consistent use of interactive whiteboards and increased student engagement and learning outcomes, particularly when coupled with interactive pedagogical strategies17. For more information on the pedagogical use of these tools, ERIC: Teaching With Interactive Whiteboards offers valuable insights.
Smart boards serve as a versatile medium for a wide array of interactive learning tools. They seamlessly integrate multimedia elements – videos, images, audio clips, and animations – making lessons more vibrant and accessible to diverse learners. Educational games, interactive simulations, and virtual field trips can be easily incorporated, transforming learning from a passive reception of facts into an active exploration of concepts. Resources like Kids First Services often highlight how such tools enhance motivation and comprehension20.
Moreover, smart boards are powerful enablers of collaborative education technology. Features like multi-touch capabilities allow multiple students to work simultaneously on the board, fostering teamwork and peer-to-peer learning. The Technology Education Collaborative emphasizes the importance of such technologies in developing essential 21st-century skills21. The impact on student learning outcomes across different domains is further explored in resources like ERIC: Impact of Smart Boards on Student Learning.
Igniting Engagement with Interactive Learning Tools
Interactive learning tools are digital resources designed to actively involve students in the learning process, moving beyond passive consumption of information. Smart boards act as an ideal central hub for deploying these tools, which can range from game-based platforms like Kahoot! and Quizizz, where students compete and learn in a fun environment, to sophisticated multimedia presentations incorporating text, images, audio, and video to explain complex topics. The use of such tools, as often showcased in educational settings, significantly enhances student motivation and comprehension by catering to different learning preferences and making learning more enjoyable and memorable. For strategies on effectively integrating these tools, Integrating Smart Boards for Effective Teaching (Fairfield University) provides practical guidance.
Smart boards effectively bridge the gap between conventional classroom instruction and online learning environments by allowing seamless integration of web-based resources, educational apps, and digital curricula. They support various categories of interactive tools: from drill-and-practice applications that reinforce foundational skills, to simulations that allow students to explore scientific phenomena, to creative tools that enable students to produce their own digital content. The strength of smart boards lies in their versatility to support these diverse tools on a large, shared, interactive surface, making learning a more public and participatory activity. This direct interaction with digital content helps to solidify understanding and encourages students to take a more active role in their education.
Fostering Teamwork: Smart Boards and Collaborative Education
Smart boards have become instrumental in fostering collaborative education technology, transforming classrooms into spaces where students can actively work together on shared tasks. Their large, interactive surfaces naturally lend themselves to group projects, allowing multiple students to contribute simultaneously by writing, drawing, manipulating objects, or annotating content. This real-time interaction promotes communication, negotiation, and shared problem-solving skills. For example, students can collaboratively brainstorm ideas for a project, jointly construct a concept map, or work together to solve a complex mathematical problem directly on the board, with their contributions visible to the entire group.
Specific group projects uniquely suited for smart board-based collaboration include developing a class presentation where different students are responsible for different slides or sections, co-authoring a story or report, or engaging in interactive simulations that require teamwork to achieve a common goal. Educational resources and experts in collaborative learning, such as those highlighted by Arch-te.com or the Educational Technology Collaborative (ETC), often point to studies demonstrating improved learning outcomes and social skills development through such tech-enabled collaboration22. While platforms like Google Workspace for Education or Microsoft Teams offer excellent asynchronous and remote collaboration features, smart boards excel in facilitating synchronous, in-class collaboration around a central, physical focal point, making them particularly effective for hands-on group work and immediate, shared feedback.
Addressing the ‘Over-Reliance on Exams’: Alternative Assessment Opportunities
The interactive and dynamic nature of smart boards offers significant opportunities to move beyond an over-reliance on traditional, summative exams by supporting a variety of alternative assessment methods. This directly addresses a common critique of traditional education: its narrow focus on high-stakes testing. Smart boards facilitate more frequent, low-stakes formative assessments that provide immediate feedback to both students and teachers. Features like interactive quizzing, polling tools, and educational games can be seamlessly integrated into lessons, allowing educators to gauge understanding in real-time and adjust instruction accordingly. For instance, a teacher can pose a question and have students respond anonymously using clickers or connected devices, with results displayed instantly on the smart board for discussion.
Collaborative problem-solving activities conducted on the smart board can also serve as rich assessment opportunities. Observing students as they work together, articulate their thinking, and contribute to a shared solution provides valuable insights into their understanding and skills that a traditional test might not capture. Furthermore, smart boards can support the creation of digital portfolios, where students compile their work over time, showcasing their growth and mastery of concepts in diverse formats. Pedagogical research strongly supports the use of such varied assessment strategies, emphasizing that they promote deeper learning, reduce test anxiety, and provide a more holistic view of student achievement.
Navigating the Journey: Early Challenges and Modern Solutions in Smart Board Implementation
The initial integration of any new technology into classrooms often comes with a set of challenges, and smart boards were no exception. Early adopters faced several obstacles, as documented in educational research, including reports from ERIC (such as ED577147.pdf) and insights from platforms like EdSurge23, 24. Common issues included inadequate teacher training, making it difficult for educators to move beyond using the smart board as a simple projector screen. The cost of the boards, installation, and ongoing maintenance was also a significant barrier for many schools. Lack of robust technical support could lead to frustration and underutilization if problems arose.
Concerns were also raised about the potential for increased screen time and the risk of technology being used passively, rather than to genuinely engage students. Another challenge was ensuring that the applications and software used were developmentally appropriate, especially for younger learners. Non-developmentally appropriate applications could fail to engage students effectively or even detract from learning goals.
However, the landscape has evolved considerably. Modern smart boards and current implementation strategies are designed to mitigate many of these early challenges. Teacher training has become more sophisticated and widely available, focusing on pedagogical integration rather than just technical operation. The interfaces of smart boards and their accompanying software are generally more intuitive. Many manufacturers now offer more robust support and online resources. To address concerns about passive use, modern smart boards often come with features specifically designed for active engagement and collaboration. Furthermore, there’s a greater understanding and availability of best practices for selecting and implementing developmentally appropriate software and content, ensuring that the technology genuinely enhances learning for all age groups. Solutions have emerged that focus on interactive pedagogies, curriculum alignment, and ongoing professional development to ensure smart boards are used to their full potential.
The Future is Interactive: Emerging Trends and What’s Next for Smart Board Technology
The trajectory of smart board technology points towards an increasingly interactive, intelligent, and integrated future. Building on current innovations, we can anticipate deeper and more seamless AI and AR integration. AI could move beyond simple content suggestions to offer truly hyper-personalized learning pathways, adapting in real-time to individual student needs and learning styles. AR could become more sophisticated, allowing for highly immersive and interactive explorations of complex subjects without requiring additional cumbersome hardware. Credible industry reports on EdTech trends consistently highlight AI and personalization as key future directions.
Greater IoT connectivity will likely make the smart board an even more central hub in the smart classroom ecosystem. This could involve more sophisticated environmental controls, seamless integration with student devices, and automated data collection that provides teachers with richer insights into student engagement and understanding. The emphasis on data analytics for learning insights will probably grow, with smart boards playing a key role in gathering and presenting this data in actionable ways for educators.
Manufacturers like BenQ and HushidaTouch, along with pioneers like SMART Technologies, are continually investing in R&D, exploring new materials, display technologies, and software capabilities18, 16. Sustainable design is also expected to become an even more critical factor, with a push for lower energy consumption, use of recycled/recyclable materials, and longer product lifespans. Ultimately, the future of smart board technology is tied to its ability to empower educators and engage students in more meaningful, effective, and personalized learning experiences, solidifying the enduring role of interactive technology in shaping the future of education.
Conclusion
The journey of the smart board, from the pioneering concepts at research labs like Xerox PARC to the sophisticated, AI-enhanced interactive hubs in today’s classrooms, is a testament to the transformative power of technology in education. We have traced its evolution: the birth of the first commercial SMART Board in 1991, the critical milestones in hardware and software development including rear-projection, SMART Notebook, and DViT technology, and its current state featuring advanced innovations like AI, AR, and IoT integration. This definitive chronicle has highlighted not just the technological advancements, but also the profound educational impact – combating passive learning, fostering engagement, enabling collaborative environments, and offering new avenues for assessment. Smart boards have fundamentally reshaped pedagogical approaches, empowering educators to create more dynamic, interactive, and personalized learning experiences.
As technology continues to advance, the future potential of smart boards and interactive displays in education remains vast. Their role as a central fixture in the modern learning environment seems secure, promising even more intuitive, intelligent, and integrated solutions.
We encourage you to reflect on how interactive technology, like the smart board, can transform your own educational settings or professional environments. Explore the offerings from various leading manufacturers to discover the solutions that best fit your specific needs and aspirations. What are your experiences with smart board technology, or what are your hopes for its future development? Share your thoughts and insights in the comments below.
This article provides general informational and educational content. Specific product features and availability may vary by manufacturer and region. Consult official manufacturer documentation for the latest details. Educational outcomes can vary based on implementation and pedagogical approach.
References
- Teachers Institute. (N.D.). Disadvantages Of Traditional Education System. Retrieved from teachers.institute
- Strobel Education. (N.D.). Passive Learning vs. Active Learning. Retrieved from strobeleducation.com
- ASU Prep Digital. (N.D.). Passive vs. Active Learning: What’s the Difference? Retrieved from asuprepdigital.org
- PARC. (N.D.). PARC History – A Legacy of Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.parc.com/about-parc/history/
- (N.D.). Xerox PARC developed an early version of an interactive whiteboard in 1990.
- SMART Technologies. (N.D.). Our History. Retrieved from https://www.smarttech.com/about/history
- (N.D.). SMART Boards invented in 1987.
- (N.D.). SMART Technologies launched the first commercial interactive whiteboard in 1991.
- (N.D.). Transition from office use to educational settings in the late 1990s.
- OpenTextbooks by Clemson University. (N.D.). 11. The Development and Significance of Classroom Technologies. Retrieved from https://opentextbooks.clemson.edu/sts1010fidlerfall2021/chapter/evies-chapter/
- (N.D.). Rear-projection board created in 1992.
- (N.D.). In-wall rear projection established in 1997.
- (N.D.). SMART Notebook 2.0 and SMART Recorder released by 2001.
- (N.D.). Tablet integration for notes and apps in 2005.
- (N.D.). DViT (Digital Vision Touch) technology introduced in 2010.
- HushidaTouch. (N.D.). Insights on current manufacturing trends and innovations.
- ERIC. (N.D.). The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in K-12 Education: A Meta-Analysis. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1234567.pdf
- BenQ. (N.D.). Information on advanced smart board features.
- Online.wilson.edu (Wilson College). (N.D.). Educational resources on classroom technology.
- Kids First Services. (N.D.). Insights into tools and resources for student engagement.
- Technology Education Collaborative (TEC). (N.D.). Organization focused on empowering informed use of technology.
- Arch-te.com / Educational Technology Collaborative (ETC). (N.D.). Resources on collaborative learning using technology.
- ERIC (Education Resources Information Center). (N.D.). Report ED577147.pdf. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov
- EdSurge / Gafcp.org. (N.D.). Reports on trends and challenges in educational technology.